Politics & History

Tag: conservatives

The Final Days of Boris Johnson

If you heard the vigorous and nauseating round of a applause that Boris Johnson received as he concluded his final (as far as we know) Prime Minister’s Questions round, you’d be forgiven for thinking his Parliamentary Party colleagues weren’t the ones who were actually defenestrating him. The Speaker of the House, Lindsay Hoyle, did nothing to admonish the MPs clapping which is considered seriously unparliamentary, despite reading the riot act to Labour MPs a few weeks ago for doing the same thing when they applauded one of their own for a particularly acerbic question. No matter, Speaker Hoyle has been a conspicuous shield of the Prime Minister and I’m sure the ermine is in the post so Hoyle can join the gravy train of indolence that is the House of Lords. In his summing up to the final question (one kindly given to a supportive MP by the Speaker), Boris Johnson stated that his administration was largely “mission accomplished” – not since those words were uttered on the USS Abraham Lincoln by George W Bush about the War on Terror have they been as inappropriate and ill judged; and to prove that here is a list of Boris Johnson’s “achievements” in office.

Boris Johnson began life as prime minister in the shadow of his own treachery – one of the leading critics of Theresa May he was prepared to jump on any bandwagon which might result in her eviction from number 10. Like David Cameron before him, Boris Johnson is part of a political class who feel they have a God-given right to rule and he himself has had his beady eyes on the top job since he first made the leap from short trousers to long.

Brexit was the key driver in bringing May down and Johnson strapped himself to that wrecking ball as it swung its way through British democracy.  He refused to back the deal she had negotiated and maintained that there were more concessions to be won (there weren’t), which would lead to him saying he had an “oven ready” deal come his first general election (he didn’t) and that Northern Ireland could be easily sorted out (it couldn’t). When he became PM he reopened negotiations with the EU who refused to accept the removal of the Northern Irish backstop which Johnson knew was always a “red line” for the EU side. Johnson then announced a £2.1bn fund to prepare for a no deal outcome because there is always a magic money tree for vanity projects.

Parliament was clearly determined to block the route to a no-deal outcome, which is what Johnson and the hard-right of his Party really wanted. In response to this, Johnson attempted to prorogue parliament on 28th August 2019 so that the Commons would not be able to bring forward any formal objection to the situation. In September this act would be declared unlawful by the UK Supreme Court – as we now know this wouldn’t be the first time Boris Johnson would be on the wrong side of the law during his stay in office and as with later breaches no harm would come to him since our political system is singularly incapable of dealing with people who wilfully break the law, lie and cheat while in public office.

There were Conservative MPs who were against Brexit generally and against a no-deal Brexit specifically and to foreshadow his emerging dictatorial nature Johnson simply expelled these people from the Conservative Party meaning they could no longer stand at the forthcoming general election as Conservatives; among them were long term members Kenneth Clarke, Nicholas Soames and Philip Hammond, until recently a Cabinet Minister under Theresa May

The election became The Brexit poll and thanks to the right of the Labour Party pushing their leader into an unworkable compromise of attempting to respect the referendum and committing to a second “people’s vote” on the EU, the Tories romped home with an 80 seat majority. With only Brexit supporting MPs being returned by the Tories it became probably the most right wing government we have had in living memory, which suited Johnson’s predilections down to the ground.

Alongside endorsements from white supremacist Steve Bannon and with hard right political adviser Dominic Cummings in toe Johnson began forming his Cabinet of hard liners. Their suitability for roles mattered not, merely their ability to nod, take orders and lie on behalf of the Prime Minister. For example Dominic Raab was brought into the Foreign Office; a man who didn’t realise Dover was a significant port and thought the sea could be closed. His Home Secretary was the disgraced death-penalty fetishist Priti Patel who was forced to resign from Theresa May’s Cabinet after having unauthorised meetings with members of the Israeli government which breached the ministerial code – however, we would come to learn that the Ministerial Code wasn’t worth the paper it was printed on under this Prime Minister.

Within a few months of this rogues gallery being assembled Covid-19 struck which would ultimately claim the lives of approx. 200,000 British citizens (and counting, despite continuing assurances that it is now “over” as of July 2022). We locked down too late, we unlocked too early, we released infected people into understaffed care homes, we provided inadequate PPE for health and care workers, we spent an astonishing £37bn on a test, track and trace system that did not work, we granted contracts of supply to friends and family of government ministers and used the pandemic as a mechanism from shifting wealth from the poorest people in society to the richest. I say “we”, but we didn’t do any of that – Boris Johnson did it. At the same time he failed to attend essential COBRA meetings set up to deal with the pandemic and lied one way or another about his own run in with the virus – at one point we were told he was continuing to run the country from a hospital bed, and later when he needed to use his illness as an excuse we were told doctors were preparing to announce his death.

During the Covid pandemic the social fabric of the nation was exposed and we could all see the threadbare, moth-eaten garment it had become after 10 years of austerity. Sick people were being forced into work, spreading the virus, as they could not afford to take time off. Self employed workers were offered nothing until public outrage granted something, but that something was far from enough. Furloughed workers were granted up to 80% of salary, but if you’re already on a minimum wage that isn’t a living wage then a 20% deduction is a recipe for starvation. Our health system was brought to its knees after years of underfunding and low pay – we were told to “clap for carers” to show our appreciation of these public sector “heroes”, but when it came to those same heroes wanting a pay rise a few years later they would be tarred as “holding the nation to ransom” by Johnson and his worker ants in the media.

Time and again Johnson’s conduct has been called in to account but also his judgement in who he counts among his friends and allies. He stood by Dominic Cummings despite everyone in the country realising he had broken the government’s own lockdown rules in his two family trips to Durham. He stood by Matt Hancock when he also had breached lockdown advice in the exact same way scientist Niall Ferguson had, the latter having to resign immediately. He stood by Owen Paterson who broke lobbying rules in parliament and moved to change the rules in retrospect before considering sacking his friend and colleague who ultimately had to resign his position and also his seat. He stood by Priti Patel when she was found to be a bully in office, which resulted in the resignations of several senior people in the Home Office. He initially even stood by sex-pest Chris Pincher, and indeed appointed him despite knowing he was a risk to others and as a result a security risk; it is alleged that Boris Johnson bragged about “all the sex-pests” in the party voting for him.

Turning to his own behaviour, as well as being found in breach of the law over the proroguing of parliament, he has also seen two ethics advisors fall by the wayside. Questions remain unanswered about the refurbishment of his Downing Street flat that somehow cost £200,000, paid for by a party donor. He has had several holidays that are essentially gifts, all of which go above the maximum amount allowed for political donations. On top of all this was Partygate – excuse piled on excuse on top of lie after lie to try and get him off the hook. In the end he was fined for partying, but only once which has all the hallmarks of a cozy stitch-up between the Metropolitan Police and Number 10. Given how many events Boris Johnson was present at; it is clear he should have had several, escalating fines. However, once should be enough and the fact is this was once too often even for the public who finally turned on the PM.

Now there is a sinister attempt to rehabilitate his reputation among his Party colleagues, but we as members of the public shouldn’t fall for it. All of the above is outside of a policy framework and this article would need to be 50 sides of A4 to even list his political failures. Can anyone forget the cack-handed way he dealt with the issue of Nazanin Zaghari-Ratcliffe and other British citizens held in prisons overseas for nothing. Let us not forget his constant and virulent racism and homophobia throughout his public life; alongside saying Muslim women looked like letterboxes and saying black people were piccaninnies with watermelon smiles he accused Barack Obama of having an ancestral dislike for Britain because of his Kenyan heritage.

Part of his Brexit pledge was to give the NHS £350m a week, which clearly it has not had – perhaps if this money materialised he would be able to build the 40 new hospitals which he promised; none of which actually exist. Three times since 2018 he has been forced to apologise for breaking parliamentary rules on financial interests and is the only prime minister I am aware of who has had the police called to their flat because of a domestic disturbance.

We (and probably he) don’t know many children he has; which for most people is their business, but not when you’re the leader of a party which holds itself as the defender of “family values” and when you market your own Christianity for votes. He belittled investigations into historic child abuse claiming it was money “spaffed up the wall” in a horrific moment of insensitivity to survivors of such abuse. He has met with ex-KGB officials in private and attended secluded parties in Italy where no one knows what happened, but anyone who has seen the pictures of him looking dishevelled in the airport on his return home can probably guess. He has allowed his Party to become an alleged money laundering service for Russian oligarch’s ill-gotten gains, as part of which some areas of London are now ghost towns being nothing more than asset havens for wealthy foreign criminals, while affordable housing is at its lowest ebb since records began.

If you’re not wealthy (or white) as someone trying to come to this country you are threatened with deportation to Rwanda – a country that has seen mass genocide within the last few decades – this is 1930s Germany territory in terms of immigration policy. Despite the Tories supposedly being the party of business he has stated “fuck business” at a business reception to mark the Queen’s birthday a few years ago.

The tale of Jennifer Arcuri is still one we haven’t got to the bottom of but it’s clear that it involves Boris Johnson attempting to effectively give public money to a woman he was having an affair with. This is a well trodden track record that carried on into his current relationship as it materialised that he tried to land her a top job at the Foreign Office for no obvious reason other than he was pumping her at the time. During the 2019 general election he misused public funds for a string of Facebook adverts and attempted to use civil servant to undermine Labour’s spending plans.

He refused even to feed hungry children in the free school meals row and to the eternal shame of the Labour Party and Keir Starmer, had to be cajoled into capitulation on the policy by footballer Marcus Rashford. All of this happened under a general policy direction of paying people less to do more work, cutting benefits to the most vulnerable in society, rigging the economy to benefit the already wealthy, cutting back on green policies that are our only defence against catastrophic climate change, allowing the continuing use of the City of London as a tax haven and slashing vital public services which we all rely on.

Boris Johnson has been a disaster for this country. A man wholly incapable of shame whose attitude to rules and laws is that they simply don’t apply to him and his kind. A complete moral vacuum who has forever stained the integrity of the high office he held for three years. The most corrupt and malign influence on British Politics this century. Vane, self-serving and quite unhinged at times he shuffles from mistake to mistruth only pausing to laugh at the wreckage beneath his feet. His legacy is a divided and chaotic nation, torn apart by a manufactured culture war designed to keep the people looking the other way. We must find a way to a better politics, one where venal narcissists can no longer debauch their positions as our representatives. At the moment, looking at the people waiting in the wings to replace the blond fabricator, I’m not hopeful but we surely have to start being better than this. 

On Brexit

We are dealing in weeks now rather than months, and it seems we are no closer to negotiating a viable exit deal from the EU than we were in the days after the cataclysmic result in 2016 which saw the resignation of David Cameron, one more Prime Minister sacrificed on the alter of hubris; go sit on the naughty step with Anthony Eden and Lord North. We are on our third Secretary for Exiting the EU in two years, David Davis and Dominic Raab have gone, the latter disagreeing with a deal he helped to negotiate and the former put in a few hours work in 18 months and showed up to meetings unbriefed and unprepared. Currently Stephen Barclay is the front man for a negotiation which is clearly lead by our hapless Prime Minister, Theresa May.

Parliament is in the midst of its second five-day debate on the deal she has negotiated, the first being pulled half way through as she knew it would fail when the vote eventually came. She promised to go back to Europe to seek concessions and reassurances, not least on the issue that was always going to be the stumbling block, Northern Ireland. Reassurances came there none, so nothing has changed and a further month has been wasted. Fortunately, a vote recently, on which the government was defeated, will force Theresa May to put any “no deal” exit to be put to parliament before it can go ahead; there is a huge majority in the House that will reject any form on No Deal and thankfully Article 50 can be unilaterally extended without the need to involve the other 27 EU states.

However, I don’t want to use this post to review what has and has not been, or even what is perhaps to come, although I have a suggestion. Brexit is something I have struggled with in many ways and I wanted to talk about this personal view to clear my own foggy head on the issue. When the vote came around in 2016 I thought hard about it; I didn’t feel I could be 100% one way or the other, and I doubt many people who ended up voting remain, as I did, were actually in love with the EU. Can you remember anyone at the time, not now, but in 2016 who was extolling how wonderful the EU was? I can’t, but I can name plenty of people who were 100% against it, and that passion has a massive effect on the electorate, even if it was backed up with a pack of lies written on the sides of buses or in the Daily Mail.

I feel you can judge an issue by who is on which side on any debate. I don’t feel I can ever be in a camp that includes Nigel Farage, Iain Duncan Smith and Paul Golding. The only way I may have voted for Brexit in the end was if we had a socialist Labour government at the time, as I felt they could build on the workers rights enshrined within EU law and regulations, that is the hope of the so-called Lexiteers, left wing brexit supporters like George Galloway but it all smelled like pipe dreams on a sewage farm, the Conservatives were and still are in charge and the cases of their senior figures wanting to use Brexit to disenfranchise workers and remove their protections are many and varied. Also, knowing more now about exiting the EU than I did in 2016, a socialist government couldn’t protect us from the market based punishments that a self-defenstration would cause.

When Jeremy Corbyn said he was seven out of 10 on the EU, that chimed with me. No one could argue the EU was a perfect model of transnational governance. The political right hate it due to a mixture of colonialism, patriotism and xenophobia and the left dislike it because it is seen as promoting free markets at the expense of fairness, community and cohesion. No one could come up with any reason to overtly support the EU as it involved maintaining a status quo that people were rightly sick of. We had experienced almost a decade of austerity at the time, people had no money and the whole of our consumer based economy is propped up by a shaky scaffold of personal debt. People witnessed and suffered so many things going against them and at times like that if you offer them a vote, for anything, they will deal you the bloody nose you want to avoid. It wasn’t so much that people wanted to leave the EU but they wanted to “stick it to the man” as the phrase goes.

From there, there has been a growing love of the EU from the centre-ground but they fail to escape the fact that their movement, whether People’s Vote or FBPE on Twitter, it is a movement being promoted most vociferously by people who were happy with how our society was in 2016, it is being lead by discredited and faded politicians who no one has any love for, whether they’re on the left or right like George Osborne, Tony Blair and Nick Clegg. The seeming commonality all these people share is a certain level of wealth; it is no wonder they were happy with things in 2016 as they were doing well, in fact they are still doing well, and so they have no idea what drove a certain constituency of people to vote for disaster two years ago, and what is more they are the least best placed people to try to readjust attitudes now. Every time Alistair Campbell speaks on Brexit he entrenches views, because as much as I could never be on the same side as Nigel Farage, there are people across the political spectrum that could never jump on a bandwagon being driven by Tony Blair’s dossier sexing, war mongering attack dog. As is often the case with a centrist movement they have proven themselves more concerned with what the left are doing, who do not have power, than with the right who do. So both movements have been turned in to an attack on the current left wing Labour leadership. What would be very interesting would be to see if they would prefer a government within the EU lead by Jeremy Corbyn, or a government out of the EU lead by Theresa May; my money would be on the latter.

But I digress. I still prefer remaining. I work in higher education and my sector will be decimated by leaving the EU (I’m not a lecturer, I’m a librarian). There are numerous research collaborations based on EU funding that will be pulled, high-fee paying foreign students will stop coming and our wonderful academic staff, world leaders in their field, will move to other countries where their talents and origins are more welcome. So many industries will be completely screwed by Brexit, and mine is just one; on top of a decade of below inflation payrises. However, without a TARDIS, how do we put a stop to this madness without invoking serious civil conflict? Right wing figures and the feral press have whipped people up in to such a state that any move towards even slowing the process down is seen as treachery; a direct result of Brexit is the rise of the right, and not just the right but outright fascism. Such ideology never went away but it was consigned to the sidelines in the darker corners of Wetherspoons and having a few hundred people have a sad little gathering in some distant municipal town square. Now we have a murdered MP, death threats against other public figures daily and I’ll be amazed if we make it March 29th or beyond without something else horrific happening that is similar to Jo Cox

What I would like to see is a Brexit that has a route back if it doesn’t work. I realise the EU is unlikely to acquiesce to something like this at first glance but given that there are movements growing for leaving the EU in other European nations it would be a perfect example for populations in those countries to see what happens. Our economy will tank on leaving the EU, one way or the other, that is what all the economic models predict to one level of disaster or another depending on the deal. I think our people need to witness this before they will see the ludicrousness of our position; not the foaming at the mouth racists who shout the loudest about Brexit, but the ones who have believed the lies that everything will be OK; and they are the majority. As soon as their house prices fall, their businesses struggle and their sons or daughters jobs are under threat they will quickly change their minds. It’s rather like the film It’s a Wonderful Life; but instead of seeing what our loved ones lives would be without us, we see what our life would be like without the EU. I don’t think there is a way to avoid some form of Brexit now, but we should move towards it being an inoculation rather than a full dose of the disease. If not, and we exit permanently, then the ensuing economic collapse will again be blamed on the poorest and least able to cope in our society as it was in 2008; but that collapse will look like a walk in the park compared to the potential Brexit has to destroy our country, and more importantly our people.

An Analysis of Conservative Government Failure 2010-2017

By the time the election comes around in June this country will have had seven years of Tory government; seven years of misery, seven years of austerity and seven years of abject failure by any reasonable analysis of available data, and by any moral code. Below is a list I have put together on how this government, and the coalition before it has failed the people of this country; not only the working class, though it is true they have suffered more than anyone; but everyone excepting the super-rich and multi-national corporations who hold the Conservative Party firmly in their back pocket.

Finances:

The one area that the Tories are seen as competent, somehow, is in the realm of the public purse. The truth, outside of the Westminster bubble is that here lies their biggest failure. George Osborne and later Philip Hammond have said they should be judged on their records. The debt in the UK currently stands at an enormous £1.73trillion[1] – double what it was under the last full Labour Parliament. This is while public spending has dropped by 5% since 2010[2]. Somehow despite cutting spending and increasing the debt, George Osborne borrowed more in his first three years as Chancellor than Labour did in 13 years of government[3]. As it stands, the Tories have borrowed more since 2010 than every Labour government combined[4]. This of course creates the conditions for extreme austerity targeted at the many, while we have seen massive tax cuts for millionaires – in 2013 George Osborne cut the top rate of tax giving the UKs 13,000 millionaires a minimum of a £100,000 tax cut each[5]. Individual tax shortfalls should be made up in taxes elsewhere, but instead of creating a progressive corporation tax model the Tories have effectively turned the UK into a modern day tax haven by having the lowest rates of any of the 20 leading global economies – just 17% by 2020, meaning massive companies such as Tesco or McDonalds will pay less tax proportionally than their employees[6] – in fact the only taxes that have risen under this government are the regressive ones that hit the poorest the hardest such as VAT and the hated Bedroom Tax. Is it any surprise when we see the deals done by HMRC with multi-national companies, behind closed doors[7]? Who can forget, also, the attempt to increase tax on the self-employed too which the government only U-turned on after massive public and Labour opposition.

Meanwhile, tax rises and austerity for the many have not been matched by any rise in income. The decline in the value of wages in this country from the global economic crash to the present is over 10%, on a par only with Greece in the developed world[8]. The earnings decline of UK workers is currently the worst for 163 years[9] when the 4th Earl of Aberdeen was Prime Minister, another Tory, and we were on the verge of a war in the Crimea. In 2016 UK productivity fell by its greatest margin since the 2008 recession, putting the workforce at 14% less productivity than pre-crisis levels[10] – Tory management of the economy and job security have led to this state. One group though, have done extremely well in the past seven years, and they are of course the already wealthy, among whom many Tory MPs are counted. The richest 1000 people in the country have seen their wealth rise by a massive £112% since 2009 (that is not a misprint – one hundred and twelve percent) – they now share a fortune of £547billion between them[11]. This is in a nation where over 1,000,000 people visited food banks last year. Even their living wage is far less than what a living wage should be – and doesn’t apply to young people. Income and wealth inequality has never been greater, and that is a deliberate policy.

The Home Office:

Perhaps the best place to look at what the psyche of our unelected leader Theresa May is would be the Home Office, the department she held for several years under David Cameron’s Premiership. One of her great policy ideas was the Snooper’s Charter, which has only been blocked at the final hurdle by the EU’s highest court (more on the EU later). The Investigatory Powers Act to give the law its proper title, would require details of every email we send, every website we visit and every social media log to be recorded by spooks[12]. Were the internet in existence in 1950s Germany this would have been the desired tool of monitoring for the Stasi. It is the equivalent to having a civil servant in your home inspecting your behaviour and should chill any decent person to the bone. While on this theme, she was also the Home Secretary that authorised the detention of David Miranda who assisted Edward Snowden in his Whistleblowing concerning what the great western powers were doing behind closed doors. She allowed the police to smash Guardian property and ignored basic rights to privacy and habeus corpus[13].

She oversaw the introduction of Police and Crime Commissioners being elected – a laughable non-entity of a policy that brought out just 15.1% of the electorate, so underwhelming were they[14]. Aside from creating a new tranche of bureaucracy in the police force, what else has she done? Well, Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary have said the cuts to police budgets in excess of 20% are “dangerous” and “disturbing”[15]. If you want to know how much the police have been cut in your area, here is a handy calculator to find out. They have been cut to the point that volunteers are now being used at crime scenes. She remains one of the few Tories ever to be jeered and booed by the Police[16]. Her policy on drugs remains in the “hang ‘em and flog ‘em” camp despite evidence from Portugal that liberalisation of drug laws aids all aspects of recovery, both individually and societal[17].

The Tories consistently bang the drum on immigration and rarely if ever point out the benefits. They know the necessity behind closed doors and personally I am in favour of immigration, but let’s judge the Tories by their own narrow view and state clearly that the government saw immigration numbers rise by 78,000 in 2014 to 260,000 overall despite a campaign promise to reduce migrant numbers to below 100,000[18]. According to one of the Tories’ favourite pressure groups, the figure stood at 273,000 for the year ending 2016[19]. Brexit is unlikely to have any significant impact on overall numbers while the much vaunted points-based system in Australia could be the worst possible option[20].

Theresa May was of course replaced by Amber Rudd when the former became Prime Minister without anyone voting for her. Amber Rudd is the director of two companies, both of which are registered in the Bahamas for reasons I’m sure you can work out[21]. One of her key policy ideas was for companies to publicly announce how many foreign workers they had on their books – she didn’t go so far as to say these workers had to wear coloured stars to identify them thankfully, but the speech in which she made the remarks has been recorded as a Hate Crime[22]. When visiting a Holocaust Memorial Museum she signed the book with the words “we must never forget” and then proceeded to remove the Dubs Amendment from UK law, which granted refugee families the right to stay together. Lord Alf Dubs was a child refugee himself, escaping the Nazis during World War II, the UK gave him somewhere safe to live as his people were being exterminated; he says the government have gone back on their word concerning refugees and he is right – we took 350 child refugees, not 3000 as the Dubs Amendment would have guaranteed[23]. On the subject of refugees, the government have continued the shameful legacy of Tony Blair’s Labour and kept privately run detention centres in operation, and continued to deport people to countries where they face torture or worse for their relationships or political beliefs. Each person held in detention (none have committed crimes remember) costs the taxpayer £30,000 a year. Amber Rudd’s previous claim to fame before politics was as the “aristocracy co-ordinator” for the film, Four Weddings and a Funeral[24]. In an astonishing move she refused to hold an independent inquiry in to the actions of Police during the year-long Miners’ strike, despite overwhelming evidence from this and other cases of the dirty tricks used by particularly Sheffield Police, most notably the Hillsborough Disaster[25].

Health:

To discuss this government’s attitude to the NHS is not unlike discussing the attitude of the KKK to black people. They hate the NHS, hate everything from its foundation to its position of almost faithlike worship among the people. It is a solid block of socialism that proves socialism, in-fact and practice, works. In their 2010 manifesto they promised “no top-down reorganisation of the NHS” and proved this to be their first of many, many lies over the next seven years as Andrew Lansley set about dismantling and selling off the profitable bits of the NHS. The most execrable changes the Tories made were making 50% of NHS beds available for private use[26] and the removal of the Secretary of State’s responsibility for NHS provision[27] – the latter being the single key point that opens wide the competition gates – that translated into £30billion of NHS contracts being put out to tender[28] across pharmacies, patient transport, diagnostics, GPs, community care and mental health services. The groups buying up massive chunks of the NHS are Virgin, Serco, CareUK, Ramsay, Circle, HCA, The Practice, Spire, GHG/BMI, Inhealth, Alliance Boots, Capita and Interserve[29] – see footnote for details on each one.

Alongside mass privatisation are the waiting times that have begun an upward trend under this government which shows no sign of being reversed. In the past year 193,406 people did not get the operation they needed within 18 weeks of being referred[30]. It took leaked data to show us that A&E departments are so overstretched and underfunded that 60,000 seriously ill people had to wait over four hours in December 2016 alone. The target for being seen within four hours in A&E is 95% (down from 98% consistently hit by Labour) and the government still haven’t hit this since Q1 2012/13 – recently it dropped as low as 81.8%[31]. Just as worrying are the 25 thousand people who waited longer than is safe to see a cancer specialist after being diagnosed last year[32].

One thing this country consistently fails with is mental health support, but the situation is getting worse rather than improving. Forty per cent of mental health trusts saw budgets cut in 2015/16 despite a pledge to fund them on a par with physical health care[33]; given that physical healthcare is also being cut perhaps this, in a twisted way, is a promise kept, as funding for both is shredded. Beds are in such short supply for people in a crisis that police cells are being used to substitute for people who are a danger to themselves, people who need care, not punishment for their condition[34].

One of the first things the Tories did in 2010 was stop the target of seeing a GP within 48 hours in 2010, now some people are having to wait four weeks to see a GP[35] and the average wait is two weeks[36]. Fifteen thousand beds have been cut since the Tories came to power[37], nurses have been cut and seen their terms and conditions fundamentally attacked meaning one in six nursing posts remains vacant[38]; most heinously the government have cut back student bursary scheme for nurses which will exacerbate the fall in nursing staff numbers, and mean numbers of people pursuing this noble profession from disadvantaged backgrounds will plummet[39]. Too few paramedic staff has led to ambulance response times dropping. One in ten posts remains empty while the workload for existing staff has doubled[40]. No wonder NHS staff are the most stressed in the public sector, 61% of healthcare professionals who took part in the research reported feeling stressed all or most of the time[41].  All of this is before we look at the way the government has tried to force Junior Doctors in to a contract that no one wants, and that everyone realises (except the Tories) is bad for patient safety and brought about the first doctors’ strike since the 1970s[42]. All of this proves the old mantra, you can’t trust the Tories with the NHS.

The Welfare State

While the NHS may provoke “under the radar” hatred from Tories, the welfare state receives no such etiquette. A piñata from day one, the area of our society relied upon by the unemployed, the disabled, pensioners etc. has been attacked, dismantled, maligned and undermined in the search for scapegoats for a failing government. In terms of work, the government always announce the monthly figure of numbers of people in work with great fanfare; almost two million since 2010 apparently. What this statistic doesn’t show is that the 1.8 million extra people in work is correlative to the number of people entering the labour market as our population grows and the amount of people on zero hours contracts – at the latest count just under one million people, but probably above this now[43]. What is less shouted about in the world of work is the amount of people who are underemployed; the UK is at the bottom of the European league for people desiring more work; it is a growing figure but as of 2014 this 26% of part time workers, or 1.8 million – what a familiar number[44].

On to the emotive issue of the disabled in our allegedly modern day Britain. Disability hate crime in 2015/16 increased in a single year by 40%[45]; a staggering figure and one must ask why? One then must look no further than government policy which has demonised disabled people more than any other group, save perhaps Muslims, in an attempt to smear them as feckless layabouts who “sleep off a life on benefits” while the rest of us work, to coin a George Osborne phrase. The first attacks disabled people were subject to were in the form of “fit for work” programme ATOS enacted on the government’s behalf. The Work Capability Assessment, now governed by Maximus has seen thousands of people declared fit for work who have subsequently died; we don’t know exactly how many as the government refuse to publish the figures, but they have finally admitted the tests spend more money than they save[46]. Many more have had their declarations overturned on appeal, but have suffered great stress and discomfort in the meantime. General declines in benefits matching other areas were coupled with the £30 Employment and Support Allowance cuts, supposedly to “incentivise” disabled people in to work. Of course a large number of disabled people had work until the government closed Remploy factories[47]. In addition we found out this year that 50,000 disabled people have had their adapted or mobility vehicles taken away, despite their clear necessity[48]. Is it any wonder people are seeing ready-made victims for their hatred in disabled people when the government are happy to use them as a punch-bag for their anti-welfare mania.

Other benefits for jobseekers and such have also not kept pace with inflation. A general smearing of the unemployed has taken place, despite the difficulty in finding a job that is not based around zero-hours or through an exploitative agency. In work benefits have been drastically cut too with the amount of hours worked to qualify for child tax credits being raised to 24 from 16[49]. The benefit cap has come in which hurts single people and people married without kids, but also detrimentally affects families with three or more children, and 74% of those hit are children[50]. Income support has been abolished for those whose youngest child is over five years old[51]. All this together equals vastly reduced support for those most in need and leads to the aforementioned shameful figure of foodbank use and the horrendous UK poverty levels, even for those in work. The number of people in-work but also in poverty stands at 7.4 million, including 2.6 million children – 55% of those in poverty are from working households[52].

Education

Anyone who was previously in doubt about the Tory attitude to social mobility should now have become aware that “knowing your place” is a Victorian attitude very much in vogue among the wealthy elite that reside in the Cabinet. The latest proposal to bring back grammar schools is another way of separating out the children of the working class from little Tarquin and Clara who shouldn’t be mixing with that sort. They are divisive, elitist and downright wrong. But we should not be surprised. The pet project of Michael Gove, Free Schools, has been an expensive folly at best, and have syphoned money away from regular state schools to the detriment of students everywhere. The money of course is being spent in every increasingly silly ways, leading to Free Schools failing Ofsted inspections at three times the rate for state schools[53]. I’m no expert but perhaps that has something to do with the curriculum in Free Schools not having to follow any kind of national standards, but rather can be set by the governors who may advocate teaching religious texts as science among other things. The NUT thankfully, are experts and what they say on Free Schools is damning and can be found here. Since all this money has been given to a vanity project it should shock nobody that the number of children being taught in oversized classrooms (36 or more pupils) has trebled since the Tories took over[54].

Adult education fares no better, and possibly worse amazingly since adult further education suffered a massive 24% cut in funding – that translates to 190,000 fewer adult education places available, while the adult skills budget has been cut by an eye-watering 40%[55]. Return to Learn, trade union diplomas, FE colleges are all affected; at a time when our economy is supposed to be proving its flexibility, we are removing people’s chance to retrain. For those staying on after school in education the Education Maintenance Allowance is now something only previous generations can remember; a vital lifeline for poorer students cut away in 2010 by the Tories. At the same time the government drew up plans to cut hundreds of youth centres[56].

There are some people considering once again voting Lib Dem this year, and they clearly have short memories or are not ex-students now crippled with debt since they allowed the Tories to increase student fees to £9000 a year, breaking a solemn promise they made in their 2010 election manifesto. What this has done is put many people from poorer backgrounds off going on to do a degree – leaving with a minimum of £27,000 debt before rent, books and spending money has even been considered is not a huge draw for council estate kids to follow their dreams of a university education. The Tories have ever been afraid of educated masses – once educated, working people ask questions and demand rights.

Even pre-schoolers don’t escape the education bonfires with the much loved Labour initiative of Sure Start being crippled by government policy. Sure Start was one of the best policies of the Blair years, and once again was socialism in action. That cannot be tolerated so out came the knives despite a cast iron promise not to cut or defund them in the build up to the 2010 election from David Cameron. It turns out that as of this year, since 2010 350 Sure Start centres have been closed by the government[57] – that’s 350 broken promises to British families.

Justice:

The Ministry of Justice was separated out from the Home Office to deal with criminal rehabilitation and punishment. What is borderline criminal is the way this department has been run over the last seven years. Despite the fact that we lock up more people than France and Germany combined, our thirst for the use of prisons is yet to be slaked, as in March 2017 it was announced that another 5000 prison places are to be built[58]. Fifteen per cent of our prisons are now run privately, for profit in the hands of Sodexo, Serco and G4S who share contracts worth £4billion. Private prisons hire less well trained staff and have wages averaging out at 23% less than the public sector[59]. In these jails prisoners work 40-hour weeks on mind-numbing jobs and are paid as little as £2 a day[60]. State run prisons are still backward places too, focusing more on punishment than rehabilitation. In 2016 a record number of 119 inmates took their own lives, 29 more than the previous year alongside over 37 thousand incidents of self-harm and over 25 thousand assaults; 6430 of these were against staff; a rise of 40% on 2015[61]. Overcrowded prisons are the worst managed, and more and more prisons are reporting over-crowding issues to this is a vicious cycle of punishment and violence.

Access to justice is becoming rarer and rarer depending on your income. Legal Aid has been cut and the government have created what Amnesty International has called a “two-tier justice system” in our country[62]. Legal Aid claims dropped in the year the cuts came in from 925,000 cases to just 497,000 – almost 50%. Legal Aid has been cut for family cases, divorce courts, immigration and asylum; essentially the people at the bottom of the legal pile. The government even attempted to deny legal aid to victims of domestic abuse but this was quashed on appeal[63]. The legal aid fiasco led to solicitors and barristers going on strike against the cuts; the Tories managing to radicalise the least naturally radical profession there is. Government attitudes to domestic violence in general can be ascertained by the fact that 17% of women’s refuges have had to close in 2010 and further cuts could lose two in three centres. In a typical day 103 children and 155 women are turned away from over-pressured refuge centres, due to government policy[64].

A further arena in which justice has been curtailed for the many is in the realm of employment tribunals. Fees for tribunals were introduced in 2013 and start at around £160 to issue a type A claim (e.g. wage claims, breach of contract etc), and £250 for a type B claim (e.g. unfair dismissal, discrimination etc). There’s also a further hearing fee of £230 for Type A and £950 for Type B claims. Appeals at the employment appeal tribunals also attract a £400 lodging and £1,200 hearing fee. If you have lost wages unfairly, or worse, your job, the one thing you are unlikely to have is spare cash on the hip to seek legal advice. A drop in tribunal claims of 70% was the result and this isn’t because Britain’s bosses have got 70% better overnight; it is because the government is hell-bent on denying working people access to fairness in the workplace[65].

Culture and Media:

William Morris said “I do not want art for a few any more than education for a few, or freedom for a few”. Sadly the present government do not share this philosophy as their policies around art and culture all too sadly demonstrate. The cornerstone of any civilised society is surely the library; an institution from the earliest civilisations that have shown the value of not only storing, but sharing knowledge. Between 2010 and 2016, 8000 library jobs were lost in the UK and 343 libraries have closed as well as countless others cutting back their hours and services – a further 111 libraries were set to close 12 months after these figures were disclosed a year ago and 224 additional libraries have been transferred to community groups or essentially privatised[66]. If you want to know what has happened to library services in your area you can find out here.

Tied in to this is funding and policies for the arts more generally; privatisations of key areas in provision at the National Gallery lead to the first strike action at the NG for a generation. This stems from the Arts Council reporting a decline in funding to the tune of £230million since 2010, with more cuts on the way[67]. This directly led to the Arts Council in turn cutting funding to 200 other organisations, many in regions not renowned for their arts leadership in the past[68]. On that note the government have been keen to pull everything back towards London and away from the provinces – the wealthy South East must have art, but no one else. This is proven by the decision to move the fabulous Royal Photography Society collection from Bradford’s excellent National Media Museum to London’s V&A despite overwhelming evidence that it was better off where it was[69].

Contributions to the poor management of this sector which includes charities have been the high turnover of ministers responsible. Jeremy Hunt, Maria Miller, Sajid Javid, John Whittingdale and now Karen Bradley have all held the position. Maria Miller was a remarkable minister who was so deeply entwined with the MPs expenses scandal that it caused Betty Boothroyd to claim she had brought parliament into disrepute[70]. Having threatened the Telegraph with her role in implementing the results of The Leveson Inquiry, her resignation letter was conspicuous due to the absence of the word “sorry”[71].

Jeremy Hunt, before he was given the task of finishing Andrew Lansley’s dismantling of the Health Service was Culture Secretary at the time of the previous BskyB takeover bid from Rupert Murdoch. This was around the same time he was responsible for the G4S security fiasco at the London Olympics where 5000 troops had to step in to fill the shortfall in supplied staff[72]. It turned out Hunt was in regular, private correspondence with James Murdoch prior to overseeing the BskyB bid[73]. While Leveson ultimately clearer Hunt of any wrongdoing (very difficult to prove a conflict of interest after all), Hunt’s judgement must seriously be called into question; though given disgraced former News of the World editor Andy Coulson was advising David Cameron at this time, poor judgement ran through the government like blood in an arterial wound.

John Whittingdale suffered the scandal of his relationship with a professional dominatrix and escort being discovered[74], but the real scandal was his handling of the BBC. He has serially attacked the BBC’s independence and influence, backed the Treasury’s assault on BBC finances, unilaterally blocked legislation recommended in Leveson and given personal support to the non-Leveson recommended Independent Press Standards Organisation, which until recently was headed, laughably, by the editor of the Daily Mail about who’s paper most complaints are made[75]. His predecessor Sajid Javid was employed by Deutsche Bank when they were committing a tax dodge worth £135million[76] – perhaps this is what earned him the promotion to Business and Skills; tax dodging skills being highly valued in the corridors of power.

Defence:

Like the treasury, the arena of defence is one in which the Tories are traditionally seen as a safe pair of hands. The officer class in the military and the MPs in parliament on Conservative benches share common interests and backgrounds and there has always been a type of quid pro quo relationship between the two. In austerity Britain though, the British army has received no such protections as it may have expected from its lords and masters. In 2012 the government decided to implement a plan to cut 20,000 soldiers from the army after Christmas of that year, bringing overall numbers down to just over 80,000 men/women – it’s lowest number since the 18th Century; some actually received their P45s while on active duty[77]. In addition to this some historic regiments have been abolished including 2nd Battalion Royal Regiment of Fusiliers, 2nd Battalion Yorkshire Regiment, 2nd Battalion Royal Welsh and 3rd Battalion Mercian Regiment; the aforementioned Yorkshire Regiment, formerly the Green Howards survived Crimea, The Boer War and both World Wars but couldn’t fight off the Tories. Plans remain in the pipeline to cut all three areas of the military even further in the years to come under a Tory government[78].

Military actions under this government have created power vacuums across the Middle East through a ludicrous misunderstanding of facts on the ground. Libya has been made unstable through intervention from the UK and our allies while the spread of ISIS across the Levant has been helped rather than hindered by the UK not knowing which sides to bomb and when. Rather than working with President Assad of Syria to remove the larger threat, we chose to team up with warlords and barbarians who are little better than the power-hungry zealots they oppose. We continue to sell weapons to Saudi Arabia (whose leaders share an extreme Wahabi ideology with ISIS), in the full knowledge that these weapons are being used against civilians in Yemen. We stay silent as Israel continues to expand illegals settlements in to The West Bank and are happy to turn a blind eye to the largest open prison in the world, and military testing ground that is the Gaza Strip.

Communities

As stated above, this country is more widely divided now than ever, but that isn’t just true of wealth and finance; we are more divided now on social, religious, racial and class lines than any time in my memory. Again, I feel this is an active policy decision by the government; divided people are able to be controlled more easily, less likely to unite against a common threat or enemy. I have already shown above how some of the most vulnerable people in our society have been alienated from it, made scapegoats for bad government decisions and being victimised for their own conditions. The government have made a conscious decision to set neighbour against neighbour; the employed vs. the unemployed, the able vs. the disabled, Muslim vs. Christian and so on. Margaret Thatcher once said there is no such thing as society, and the Tories are creating the conditions for the destruction of society before our very eyes. The only tool we have against the power of divisiveness is the counter-attack of unity and organisation. Recently when Britain First, the EDL and their ilk showed up in one of our most diverse cities, Birmingham, to exploit the fear caused by one maniac in London they were met with the most British of protests; a tea party, held by local Muslims in a Mosque where all were welcome. That is my Britain, not the hate filled bile that leaks out of the Daily Mail and The Sun on a regular basis endorsed by this government whose actions speak louder than words; e.g. While demanding new arrivals to this country speak English, the government under David Cameron cut ESOL courses by £1.5million affecting 16,000 learners[79].

Can there be a more loved public service after the NHS than the Fire Service? Men and women who run in to burning buildings, risking not just their health but their very lives to save others is the most gallant of roles in our society. The Tories, in reward for the hard work of firefighters, have cut 10,000 posts since 2010 and have plans to cut a further 20% of posts by 2020[80]. The Fire Service is a bit of an incorrect term these days given that the teams around the country respond to flooding, road accidents, industrial matters, civil contingencies and terrorist attacks in addition to their more regular objective of battling raging inferno’s and saving people from them. I am given to understand they rescue the odd cat from a tree as well, if Ladybird books are to be believed.

Local services aimed at communities and wellbeing have also been hit since 2010. Almost £60million has been cut from the parks budget. Young people are playing more sport than ever thanks to our successes at an international level, but they are not being helped by Leisure Centres losing £71million since 2010, leading some centres to replace lifeguards at swimming pools with camera systems. Eighty per cent of amateur football is played on council maintained pitches but these are in an “abhorrent state”, while hiring fees have gone up by 300% in some cases[81]. Despite the level of young people playing sport, we still have a child obesity crisis with almost 20% of 11-12 year olds declared obese[82]; cutting access to leisure centres and other sports services is hardly likely to help, especially given the government’s lacklustre approach to progressive taxation on sugary drinks and their advertising.

The targeting of local government cuts has been particularly telling; in some Labour governed areas, cuts have been five times what councils face in traditional Tory-voting areas[83]. The cherry atop that cake is that it is the poorer areas, i.e. Labour controlled ones, that need better access to services. Councils in areas in the constituencies of Cabinet Ministers were least hit, in a remarkable show of arrogance from the front bench[84]. And we all know now about the “sweetheart” deals the government has done with Surrey Council[85] – is this just the tip of a huge iceberg? The first Tory Communities and Local Government minister was Eric Pickles; Bradford Council could have told us what to expect after his time as a councillor in the Town Hall there: £50million in cuts, a third reduction in all staff and mass privatisations of services[86]; and this was during a time of national growth and balanced budgets.

Transport:

Absolute, unswerving ideological commitment to competitive, free-market economics is most visible in Tory attitudes to national transport policy. The prime example was the re-privatisation of the East Coast mainline which had to be taken under public ownership in 2009, after the privateer, National Express, pulled out of running the service. Between 2009 and 2015 the nationalised service brought £1billion in to treasury coffers, had record high satisfaction ratings and increased profits which were then spent on improving services instead of going to managers and shareholders[87]. Virgin/Stagecoach took over the route despite massive opposition and joined in the subsidy free for all that replaced British Rail. Since rail privatisation in 1995 rail tickets have gone up by 117%, they are slower than our European counterparts’ nationalised services, the cost to the public of running the railways has more than doubled and over 90% of rail profits are paid straight to Shareholders without any thought given to the passenger, or the taxpayer[88]. Our government has nothing against public ownership, as long it isn’t the British state that owns the service. Our rail network is owned by a mixture of state-owned enterprises from France, Germany, The Netherlands, Hong Kong and Italy[89], it is nothing more than a slavish subservience to “the market” that stops us taking back control of our transport infrastructure in to public hands; British public hands.

Our bus network is also privatised, but again heavily subsidised by the taxpayer. Since 2010 funding for buses has been slashed by 15% with 2000 national routes being reduces or withdrawn completely[90]. Meanwhile rural bus services in England and Wales face being wiped out altogether by government cuts[91]; services young people rely on to get to school, or old people rely on to get to the shops. There has been talk of cutting the free bus pass for the elderly too, making it doubly difficult to get about in some areas[92].

Environment:

What was billed as “the greenest blue government of all time” has turned out to be quite the opposite. Last year parliament was warned that the government was likely to miss its 2020 renewable energy target[93], meaning we had a commitment to meet 15% of our energy needs supplied by renewables by the year 2020; living on a windy island, with high tidal fluctuations that gets plenty of daylight meant this should have been easy but government mismanagement and lack of any real belief or concern in climate change has meant this has been thrown on the back-burner (pun most definitely intended). A day after cutting subsidies for solar and onshore wind farms, funding was also pulled for the Green Deal scheme, and the home improvement scheme to make houses more energy efficient[94], a further £1billion carbon capture tender was also cancelled costing potentially thousands of jobs[95]. It would be wrong to suggest Saudi Arabia continue to buy our weapons in return for us buying their oil and cancelling renewable energy subsidies of course, so I won’t suggest that.

Non-renewable energy schemes are all the rage however, with government giving the green light to fracking in Lancashire, ignoring mass-local opposition and environmental concerns around local wildlife habitats, subsidence, water quality and long-term causal effects of fracking in geological terms. There is also no evidence that bills would come down as a result of fracking, and on that note, since 2010 energy bills have risen by an average of 10% above inflation since 2010[96]. For some customers they have risen as high as 28% and the “big 6” energy companies have warned of bigger rises to come[97].

Those who remember the early days of the Coalition will remember the ludicrous idea to privatise British forests; it was laughed out of sight by the media and by the public more importantly. Now however, small-scale privatisations are happening as chunks of land get sold off for energy exploration or for luxury holiday cabins[98]. Proof that where there is a public amenity, a Tory wanting to sell it is never far away. Staying in woodland areas, the badger cull seems a cruel and unnecessary technique to limit numbers on shaky evidence. The largest ever study of badger to bovine TB concluded “badger culling can make no meaningful contribution to cattle TB control in Britain”[99]. The cost of the culls have come in at £16.8million for the two years to 2014, with more culls having happened since; is this a good use of public money? It seems that whether it is foxes or badgers, the upper-classes just can’t help themselves in their desire to kill small, furry, woodland creatures.

Other things the wealthy like to hunt are grouse; it’s a long tradition and while brutal for the grouse doesn’t cause real problems in and of itself. However land clearances to create paths for grouse shoots does affect a lot of things, principally natural flood defences. Boxing Day 2015 saw huge swathes of land flooded by torrential downpours; homes wrecked, businesses closed and lives ruined; it’s impossible to know exactly how much but a contributory factor was the clearance of land for grouse shooting in the upper-Calder Valley for example[100]. Flooding costs an average of £1billion every year so you would think flood defences would be vital, but in 2014 it was revealed that flood defence money was cut by £250million[101] and in 2016 the Environment Agency stated that coming government policy would lead twice as many households at significant risk of flooding within 20 years[102] – in fact it will be more because the government still advocates building housing on flood plains[103].

Housing:

That seems like a nice segue in to housing policy. I grew up in a council house, many of my family still live in them and I would if I could but there are none in the area I choose to live. Local authority housing provision, the term du jour, has dropped significantly since 2010 with over 100,000 less council houses; we have to go back to 2003 to find parity between units of private rentals and council houses. There has been a 23% decline in social housing built since 2011/12[104] – a million people linger on council house waiting lists[105].

For buyers meanwhile it is harder and harder to get a foot on the rung of the property ladder; the average price of a house in 2016 was £214,000[106]. Since 1971 if wages had risen in line with the amount house prices had risen, the average salary would be £87,720[107]. At the same time, five families an hour are made homeless in modern day Britain; in 2016 over 40,000 families were accepted as homeless by the DCLG[108] and yet according to the charity, Shelter, there are over 200,000 empty houses in our country[109].

Additional:

The above are all related to government policy in the suggested areas. What follows are further bad ideas, legislation and initiatives exemplify the Conservative’s approach to governance, that don’t necessarily fit in to a single government department.

When David Cameron stepped down in 2016, despite assuring the national he would not in an answer at PMQs to Richard Burgon’s question on the 9th March, he left a divided nation in tatters. His replacement won not a single vote to become Prime Minister or Conservative Party Leader. We are governed by a Prime Minister with no mandate from the people; an election should have been called there and then, not nearly a year down the line when the opinion polls look rosy to her think-tank acolytes. Opinion polls are used to shape the public mood, not reflect it by the way! It is worth briefly remembering what took place to bring these events about.

David Cameron, borrowing the clothes of UKIP, promised a referendum on UK membership of the EU as a manifesto commitment in 2015, that vote took place in 2016 and we are all aware of the outcome. In his Faustian pact with UKIP supporters, and with no little hubris, David Cameron was made to look a complete fool; believing he could play Machiavellian games with democracy and win. He must have known at the time that large chunks of his own party were anti-EU in the extreme and that the newspapers, so often in his corner, would be opposed on this particular issue. Yet onwards he trudged into the breach, Mail’s to the left of him, Expresses to the right and was blasted to pieces by his own arrogance. Theresa May has stepped in saying Brexit means Brexit; she’s given them colours and boiled statuses and is now pursuing our removal from the single market, the end to free movement of people and a severing of any residual ties through court or regulatory systems. That is not what people voted for, but it is the reason for this opportunistic election. She believes not in a stronger mandate for Brexit, but for more power to do what the Tories want after Brexit is done and dusted; and that means removal of employment protections, destruction of the human rights act, health and safety legislation torn up and a hundred other things that will be awful for working people, but great for slavedrivers and gangmasters up and down the country. And to call an election while a significant number of sitting Tory MPs may be being charged any day with electoral fraud is an absolute slap in the face to democracy[110].

Where do people go when they have bad bosses making their lives miserable or unsafe, or who find themselves in exploitative situations? They go to trade unions but we have already seen our unions crippled by the Trade Union Act. We already had the most draconian anti-union legislation in the developed world (outside the USA) and now it is even worse. Trade union legislation is the only area where Theresa May wants to see red tape expanding. Financially and administratively trade unions are tied in knots; it will be almost impossible to withdraw labour or picket for better terms and conditions, antediluvian voting practices remain intact, facility time is monitored and reported on, sequestration of funds is easier and all this equals a worse deal for the worker. There are six million trade union members in this country and they have been hit by this backward looking law, furthermore the removal of EU regulations will mean even bigger attacks on trade union members will be on their way. Ironically one of the strongest defences of trade unions came from the unelected second chamber, The House of Lords, of which the Tories have blocked reform since the year dot. To have drifted to the right of the landed gentry and noble peers of the realm is quite an achievement indeed.

The Conservatives have continued with their gerrymandering agenda too, making it easier for Tory MPs to be elected all around the country. They have blocked any reform of our anachronistic first past the post system, as it benefits them the most. In 2015 the Tories won a seat for every 34,244 voters who opted for the Conservatives, it took an average of 40,290 to win a Labour seat; that ratio is set to become more unfair after the boundary changes take effect[111]. Meanwhile the Green Party lodged 1.157million votes in 2015 but returned just one MP, Caroline Lucas[112]. She along with many other female MPs on opposition benches were outraged by the Tampon Tax; but it’s OK we are told, the money raised from it will go to women’s charities. Am I the only person who finds it appalling that a regressive tax on women’s essential medical needs are being used to pay for care after sexual violence that should be 100% government funded from the start? But again, why am I surprised when such vital services such as rape crisis centres are being cut back by this government so that 10,000 women waited over a year for specialist counselling, and thousands more could not access any support at all[113].

There are individual scandals such as Plebgate and “extra-curricular” relationships of ministers. Barring a few swipes at particularly egregious offenders I have tried to stay away from mocking the way Liz Truss says “pork markets” or any other such base satire. I must say though, I am frankly amazed this all didn’t come crashing down when we found out David Cameron may have stuck his walloper in a dead pig; that would have finished any Labour politician’s career and just goes to show it’s not only the Tories we are fighting, it is their buddies in the media, the judiciary and forces of law enforcement that we are up against. I hope this fully referenced piece of work goes some way to redressing the balance and I make no apologies for pointing out only the policy failures of the last seven years; the successes would make for a much shorter piece of work. All that remains to say is, vote Labour on June 8th.

[1] http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/uk_national_debt_chart.html

[2] http://www.ukpublicspending.co.uk/uk_national_spending_analysis

[3] http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2013/11/21/uk-borrowing-_n_4316084.html

[4] http://voxpoliticalonline.com/2017/03/01/conservatives-have-created-more-debt-than-all-labour-governments-combined-corbyn-tells-the-world/

[5] https://fullfact.org/economy/are-13000-millionaires-getting-100000-tax-cut/

[6] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/11/21/theresa-may-to-offer-business-an-olive-branch-with-hint-of-futur/

[7] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2013/apr/29/sweetheart-tax-deals

[8] http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2016/07/uk-real-wages-decline-10-severe-oecd-equal-greece/

[9] http://touchstoneblog.org.uk/2016/11/no-bones-worst-real-earnings-decline-least-162-years/

[10] https://www.ft.com/content/e8b0639c-fcaa-11e5-b5f5-070dca6d0a0d

[11] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2015/apr/26/recession-rich-britains-wealthiest-double-net-worth-since-crisis

[12] http://www.computerworlduk.com/security/draft-investigatory-powers-bill-what-you-need-know-3629116/

[13] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/jan/19/the-guardian-view-on-the-david-miranda-verdict-a-counterpunch-for-freedom

[14] http://www.electoralcommission.org.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0003/154353/PCC-Elections-Report.pdf

[15] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2017/mar/02/inspectorate-police-engaging-dangerous-practices-austerity-cuts-diane-abbott

[16] https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/may/16/theresa-may-heckled-police-conference

[17] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/europe/portugal-decriminalised-drugs-14-years-ago-and-now-hardly-anyone-dies-from-overdosing-10301780.html

[18] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2014/nov/27/uk-net-migration-rises-above-2010-level

[19] https://www.migrationwatchuk.org/statistics-net-migration-statistics

[20] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/brexit-latest-eu-free-movement-not-reduce-immigration-house-of-lords-eu-home-affairs-sub-committee-a7612796.html

[21] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/sep/21/bahamas-leaks-reveal-amber-rudd-involvement-offshore-firms

[22] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2017/jan/12/amber-rudd-speech-on-foreign-workers-recorded-as-hate-incident

[23] http://www.bbc.co.uk/newsround/38932500

[24] https://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/oct/03/amber-rudd-i-was-aristocracy-coordinator-on-four-weddings-and-a-funeral

[25] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/home-secretary-rules-out-inquiry-into-1984-battle-of-orgreave-between-miners-and-police-a7389151.html

[26] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-16337904

[27] http://www.nhsforsale.info/database/impact-database/is-the-nhs-less-accountable/Sec-of-State-for-Health.html

[28] http://nhsforsale.info/uploads/images/contract_alert_feb_2016.pdf

[29] http://nhsforsale.info/private-providers.html

[30] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/jan/13/193000-nhs-patients-a-month-waiting-beyond-target-for-surgery

[31] http://www.qualitywatch.org.uk/indicator/ae-waiting-times

[32] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/apr/18/revealed-100000-wait-more-than-two-weeks-to-see-cancer-specialist

[33] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-37657954

[34] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/oct/25/police-britain-mental-health-cuts-crisis

[35] http://news.sky.com/story/extended-gp-waiting-times-pose-serious-risk-to-patients-10710722

[36] http://www.nowgp.com/blog/average-gp-waiting-times-two-weeks/

[37] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/02/20/nhs-breaking-point-now-norm-says-bma-bed-reductions-revealed/

[38] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/nov/12/nursing-cuts-putting-nhs-patients-at-risk

[39] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-36336830

[40] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/feb/05/paramedics-save-lives-nhs-cuts-breaking-point

[41] https://www.theguardian.com/healthcare-network/2015/jun/12/nhs-staff-most-stressed-public-sector-workers-survey-finds

[42] http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/doctors-strike-information-you-affected-7157038

[43] https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/sep/08/uk-workers-zero-hours-contracts-rise-tuc

[44] http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/documents/2995521/6800423/3-27042015-AP-EN.pdf/08a0ac51-c63d-44d0-ad29-248127fd01c3

[45] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/07/13/prosecutions-for-hate-crimes-against-disabled-people-surge-by-mo/

[46] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/dwp-fit-to-work-assessments-cost-more-than-they-save-report-reveals-a6801636.html

[47] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/oct/30/remploy-factories-close-disabled-workers

[48] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/benefit-cuts-disability-welfare-pip-adapted-vehicles-a7678926.html

[49] http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/budget-2015-50-cuts-tory-led-5354805

[50] Ibid

[51] Ibid

[52] https://www.jrf.org.uk/press/work-poverty-hits-record-high-housing-crisis-fuels-insecurity

[53] https://www.theguardian.com/education/2014/apr/29/free-schools-ofsted-failure-rate-higher-state

[54] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-38506305

[55] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/mar/26/adult-education-funding-cuts

[56] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/cuts-to-youth-services-will-lead-to-poverty-and-crime-say-unions-9659504.html

[57] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/feb/02/sure-start-centres-300-closed-since-2010

[58] http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/PressPolicy/News/vw/1/ItemID/419

[59] https://weownit.org.uk/public-ownership/prisons

[60] Ibid

[61] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-38756409

[62] https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur45/4936/2016/en/

[63] https://www.theguardian.com/law/2016/feb/18/changes-to-legal-aid-for-domestic-violence-victims-ruled-invalid

[64] https://www.womensaid.org.uk/what-we-do/campaigning-and-influencing/campaign-with-us/sos/

[65] https://www.unison.org.uk/news/press-release/2017/01/the-government-should-admit-employment-tribunal-fees-were-a-mistake-and-scrap-them-says-unison/

[66] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-35707956

[67] http://www.artlyst.com/news/arts-council-england-reports-230m-decline-in-arts-funding-since-2010/

[68] https://www.civilsociety.co.uk/news/arts-council-cuts-funding-to-more-than-200-organisations.html

[69] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/feb/01/bradford-museum-london-royal-photography-society-national-media-museum

[70] http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/maria-miller-expenses-scandal-tory-3390892

[71] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/mps-expenses/conservative-mps-expenses/10744703/Senior-David-Cameron-aide-threatened-Daily-Telegraph-over-Maria-Miller-expenses.html

[72] http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/olympics/news/so-did-london-2012-pass-the-olympic-test-8037290.html

[73] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/jeremy-hunt-health-secretary-junior-doctors-strike-most-controversial-moments-a7001471.html

[74] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/04/12/minister-john-whittingdale-admits-relationship-with-sex-worker/

[75] https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourbeeb/james-cusick/real-whittingdale-scandal-cover-up-by-press

[76] http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3486895/Come-clean-bank-bonus-scheme-Javid-told-Labour-Business-Secretary-accused-showing-contempt-taxpayers-deal-dodge-tax.html

[77] http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/jake-warren/remembrance-sunday_b_6146000.html

[78] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/12/27/forces-braced-cuts-defence-cash-squeeze/

[79] https://blogs.spectator.co.uk/2016/01/if-cameron-wants-female-migrants-to-learn-english-why-did-he-cut-esol-funding/#

[80] https://www.fbu.org.uk/SOFS

[81] https://www.unison.org.uk/at-work/local-government/key-issues/cuts-to-local-services/

[82] https://www.theguardian.com/society/2016/nov/03/child-obesity-rising-again-nhs-report-reveals

[83] http://labourlist.org/2016/04/cuts-to-labour-councils-five-times-higher-new-research-finds/

[84] https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/apr/23/cabinet-ministers-councils-least-hit-budget-cuts

[85] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-surrey-39198308

[86] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Pickles

[87] http://www.rmt.org.uk/news/rmt-protests-on-last-day-of-east-coast-main-line/

[88] http://actionforrail.org/the-four-big-myths-of-uk-rail-privatisation/

[89] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/apr/01/british-rail-franchises-foreign-owners-subsidy

[90] http://www.bettertransport.org.uk/new-research-half-local-authorities-withdrawing-buses-after-budgets-are-slashed-15-cent

[91] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-35489514

[92] https://www.theguardian.com/money/2014/sep/06/free-bus-passes-under-threat-pensioners

[93] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/sep/09/uk-will-miss-its-2020-renewable-energy-targets-warn-mps

[94] https://www.ft.com/content/50b05956-315f-11e5-91ac-a5e17d9b4cff

[95] https://www.ft.com/content/f031a582-e07f-11e5-8d9b-e88a2a889797

[96] https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/3200741/3200741/

[97] https://www.theguardian.com/business/2017/feb/22/energy-prices-energy-uk-bills

[98] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2015/feb/17/privatisation-uk-woodlands-happening-by-backdoor

[99] http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130402151656/http://archive.defra.gov.uk/foodfarm/farmanimal/diseases/atoz/tb/isg/report/final_report.pdf

[100] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/green-party/12102239/Over-managed-grouse-moors-made-floods-worse-says-Green-party-leader-Natalie-Bennett.html

[101] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10661814/Flood-defence-cash-cut-by-250m-despite-PMs-claim.html

[102] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jan/02/tory-cuts-wrecking-uk-flood-defences

[103] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jan/27/homes-and-companies-should-be-built-on-flood-plains-despite-risks-says-panel

[104] http://england.shelter.org.uk/campaigns_/why_we_campaign/housing_facts_and_figures/subsection?section=housing_supply

[105] https://fullfact.org/economy/brief-introduction-housing-issues/

[106] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/house-prices/the-state-of-the-uk-housing-market-in-five-charts/

[107] http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mortgageshome/article-2462753/How-items-cost-risen-line-house-prices.html

[108] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/homeless-rough-sleeping-figures-increase-rise-conservatives-housing-shelter-vertical-rush-a7550251.html

[109] http://england.shelter.org.uk/campaigns_/why_we_campaign/housing_facts_and_figures/subsection?section=housing_supply

[110] http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/tory-election-fraud-prosecutions-cps-election-campaign-result-overturn-battle-bus-a7689801.html

[111] https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/sep/13/boundary-changes-tories-ruthless-gerrymandering

[112] https://www.opendemocracy.net/ourkingdom/liam-anderson/voters-per-mp-why-first-past-post-failed

[113] http://www.sistersuncut.org/2016/02/04/sexual-violence-services-are-being-cut-itsnotok/

The Student as Sovereign

It’s very difficult not to admire the Machiavellian nature of the Conservative agenda. They are scrupulous in their attention to detail and their ability to make others do their dirty work for them. In particular I am referring to government plans for higher education, presented to us in the form of a Green Paper Fulfilling Our Potential: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice. The contents of this paper are the next steps on the path to a complete liberalisation of higher education, which began with fees being introduced, first under Labour and then increased to £9000 a year under the Coalition government lead by the Tories.

The Machiavellian element of which I speak is the ambition to alter the entire basis of learning within the higher educational institution. It transforms the philosophical nature of the student as a learner and rebuilds them in the corporate image as a consumer; a buyer; the sine qua non of a capitalist entity. In doing so the government transforms the student into a calculated weapon aimed squarely at the very concept of higher education.

The method for this metamorphoses is presented in the form of the Teaching Excellence Framework, run alongside and in the style of the Research Excellence Framework – a mechanism, apparently, for reviewing the quality of research output from individual institution across their subject areas, scoring and ranking them, then providing funding based on these ratings – the higher the quality of the research the higher your funding. Unfortunately the REF has become a costly, over-bureaucratised spending exercise that proves how well institutions can jump through government hoops, but does nothing to increase the quality of our national research output. Similarly the methodology behind the TEF will be aimed at anything other than improving teaching quality.

The government proposes three metrics within the TEF to assess institutions:

  • Data on ‘retention’ (i.e. drop-out rates)
  • National Student Survey (NSS) scores
  • Data on graduate employment.

Because these are easily-quantifiable areas does not mean they are barometers of teaching quality. Drop-out rates can be affected by many socio-economic factors dependent on an institutions geography, its student demographic and funding. NSS scores can be excellent for courses where gaining good grades is too easy, or the tutor “good fun” – those that teach well and in difficult areas are less likely to be perceived as excellent by the student filling in the survey – or take those who have existential disagreements with their tutors, particularly in the arts and social sciences; that you disagree fundamentally with the content of a course does not mean that said course is being taught badly, but a student has the power through the NSS to alter the perceived quality of said tutor. Lastly, data on graduate employment is the most worrying. Graduate employment can be determined by many other things than the quality of your teaching at university; social contacts, class background, the name of an institution, family ties and money can all contribute to your employability, contribute much more than the quality of what you were taught at university in most cases. The only reason for this being a measure of institutional success seems to be to increase the gap between the well-funded Russell Group universities, particularly Oxbridge colleges, and the rest. It sets in permanence the domination of our most ancient schools, and gives further succour to those private preparatory, elementary and secondary schools that exacerbate social inequalities throughout our society. It is worth pointing out here that those institutions that are rated most generously in the TEF will get permission to increase their fees; at the moment this will be tied to inflation but there is plenty of wiggle room in the Bill to manoeuvre in to a more financial propitious position. It seems that the pitifully small handful of working class kids making it to Oxbridge is already too high a number for the garlanded elites to stomach.

So why are students being given, and forced to use, the tools of destruction for so many HE bodies? The reason presents itself in the government’s obsession with marketising everything. The Victorian mercantalist assumption that we are in a global race for power rather than producing adults capable of free-through and critical faculty. The Paper suggests that governments can push funding for, and the existence of, courses towards the economic needs of the society at any one time. So knowledge, learning and self-governance is to be turned in to the market-driven, right-wing supply and demand economics of the capitalist schema. The conversion of the concept of learning in to a for-profit, nationalist ideal – all through the obliteration of the student as a progressive, thinking individual and into an automaton concerned only with future employment prospects and national growth forecasts. Students, like Trade Unions, are the last real bastions of progressive influence in the national debate and isn’t it interesting that the Green Paper for HE, which forces students into being right-wing agents of change, comes as the Trade Union Bill, curtailing the rights of trade unionists everywhere, is going through parliament.

The Tories in their disguise as enablers here are trying to portray themselves as knowing what is best for students; that they are empowering them by giving them the stick of dynamite and the matches. Tory attitudes towards students haven’t changed; they are still a dangerous mob that could bring a government down. Look at how George Osborne behaved in the Spending Review last year, when he said quietly that the terms of loans taken out since 2012 are to be varied retrospectively. The personal income rate at which loan repayments start will not be increased in line with average earnings or inflation, as was promised at the time, adding overnight several thousand pounds to many students’ eventual repayments. A bank or building society that retrospectively changed the terms for existing borrowers in this way might fall foul of prosecution, but not HM Government.

I don’t think anybody imagines that university teaching is perfect and there certainly needs to be some kind of assessment process. Too much time and money has been spent on research, or rather providing evidence that your research is meaningful; box-ticking and bureaucracy have become part of the academic calendar – coupled with the fact that administrative and support staff have been cut back, more and more academics are required to do their own paperwork reducing further their ability to teach. Secondary schools have a robust network of inspection in place which involves a physical presence in classrooms from the regulator; clear observation and reporting. Teaching quality can only be measured on judgement and not metrics but the latter is all the TEF will rely on, and the institutions will provide the evidence themselves alongside students, creating a whole new layer of middle and senior management. It’s another example of the Tories identifying a genuine problem, but rather than sort it out, they are utilising it to further their own political agenda, and to hell with the educational consequences.

Further carelessness with the fruits of educational labour are present in the relaxing of rules around who and what can become universities and award degrees. It turns out that the Green Paper includes a section on gaining “new providers” (see corporations) who will have access to lucrative student loans in exchange for a worthless degree that is only applicable in their business area, or worse their own company. Given that new providers can be wholly owned by a single parent company, using that parent company’s finances as collateral makes a mockery of any kind of sustainability rules which present universities have to abide by. The usual guff around increased competition ‘driving up quality’ and ‘driving down prices’ is dusted off and as always, is borrowed from the lie used to sell any ill-judged privatisation to a public too bathed in ennui to care.

The Green Paper in short is a recipe for disaster in higher education, the way constant upheaval has been for adult further education, but on a much larger scale. More managers, business intrusion in teaching, further needless policy making within institutions, more propaganda to ensure high NSS scores, further pressure on academics to do what the institution expects as opposed to what is good for their students (should be commensurate; isn’t), further league tables and ratings mechanisms giving opportunities for institutional boasting. What it won’t do is make teaching any better, and it certainly won’t make higher education any better, more worthwhile or adaptable. What business need comes from learning Shakespeare; none are obvious, but the person, the soul is nurtured indeed by such study of wisdom. Surely on reading this mockery of a proposal for better teaching, the great Bard would turn to the government and utter wearily, et tu!

A Call For Labour Unity

“We are only as strong as we are united, as weak as we are divided”. OK I know, that’s a quote Dumbledore in Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire but it’s no less poignant for that when we look at the current situation the Labour Party finds itself in. We shouldn’t need a fictional wizard to tell us that we need to act in unison against The Tories, or “they who shall not be named” (OK, I’ll stop). The plans they have already enacted, what is currently being proposed and what their intentions are for the future should give every Labour MP, activist, members and supporter pause for thought. We are living in the age of the most extreme right-wing government this country has ever seen, and they are acting without a coherent opposition, they are acting against the poor, the sick and disabled, minorities, public services and the best interests of the nation – all with a majority of just 12 seats. Such a government should be paranoid about losing a key vote at any moment, or that a by-election comes up, but due to the disjointed nature of the opposition they are cock-sure of themselves and ready to pass any law they want, no matter how extreme (I refuse to use the term radical, to me progress is radical and this aint progress).

Jeremy Corbyn won by a huge margin to become leader of the Labour Party from all supporting sections, no matter how the electorate was broken down. The majority of the Parliamentary Party couldn’t believe it, and seem to be acting as though they refuse to believe it. The PLP has always been to the right of the membership but they should still be committed to the central tenets or clauses of the Labour constitution. Those clauses are built around socialism and progressive politics; not free market ideology or aggressive foreign policy. Watching the parade of Labour MPs lining up to denounce the leadership openly, or resign because of some fabricated reasoning is frankly sickening and delegitimises the whole Party in the eyes of the British people.

In the past week since a minor reshuffle took place in the Shadow Cabinet four Labour figures have resigned their parliamentary roles. Stephen Doughty, Jonathan Reynolds and Kevan Jones quit last week while Catherin McKinnell quit today, all from positions of protest against their leader – McKinnell going so far as to say one of the reasons for resigning was because of a lack or party unity – how resigning helps that unity is anyone’s guess. Doughty resigned live on TV during PMQs leading some to accuse the Labour right of working with the BBC to orchestrate the situation that would damage Corbyn the most – a move that put the Daily Mail out of joint because it couldn’t criticise Jeremy Corbyn AND the BBC, but had to choose one and defend the other.

These self-styled rebels, whom no one had ever heard over prior to last week, seem hell bent on destroying the party from within. Their actions are anti-Democratic and anti-Labour. They call themselves “moderates”, and in opposition to the “extreme left cabal” running the party. Who knew to be on the extreme left of politics was to support nationalised railways, a fully funded NHS incorporating social care, full employment, council house building, free university places, fairer taxation, decent pay, terms and conditions, the living wage, land reform, closing tax loopholes and havens, tackling climate change, freedom of information, British industries, robust health and safety legislation, strong trade unions, an ethical foreign policy and House of Lords reform. If the so called “rebels” don’t want any of these things then they are in the wrong party because this is what Corbyn’s Labour stands for, and what Labour should always stand for.

The Labour Party was set up by the people, by trade unions so the poor would have a voice in parliament. We didn’t give our voice to such people that would foment civil war within the Party. Where Corbynite or not the one thing members want right now is robust opposition to the lies, spin and nastiness of Tory Government policy. There is too much to oppose to waste time in-fighting – and yes, I know it’s not all one way traffic on that front. A line has to be drawn under recent weeks of problems and we must re-focus on the real enemy. Presently the government has plans to:

  • Make trade unions unable to functions by stripping them of their money and remaining power
  • Demolish all social housing in London to socially cleanse the Capital
  • Continue to cut public services so that public spending is 35% of GDP, last seen in the 1930s
  • Demolish the welfare state that working class people fought centuries to get
  • Close borders to anyone other than white English speaking nations
  • Bring in surveillance laws that are terrifying in their scale and potential for abuse
  • Privatise the NHS through a toxic mixture of underfunding and overinspecting
  • Reduce the top rate of income tax further
  • Force schools to become private academies run for profit by G4S, Capita etc
  • Gerrymander political boundaries to keep themselves in power for decades
  • Enter in to ill-thought out foreign conflicts, endangering civilians abroad and citizens at home
  • Cut benefits to the point where disadvantaged and disabled people at severe risk of death through neglect and starvation
  • Remove health and safety legislation further and increasing deaths and accidents at work
  • Abolishing green targets and giving subsidies to fracking companies, while removing subsidies for renewable energy

That’s just for starters. The Labour Party can’t afford to waste time fighting among itself. Its needs to regroup and defend those sections of our society that need defending. They are the only ones that are going to do it. The so-called moderates and letting the SNP look like the real opposition in Westminster and the Tories are laughing at their useful idiots in red ties who are undermining an entire movement. Some are doing it deliberately, others think they have the long term interests of the Party at heart, but they lost the election. Jeremy Corbyn is leader and should be given the chance to be elected. If he is as unelectable as they seem to think he is then the electorate will confirm it in 2020, but he has won the right to put the question to the people of the UK.

Labour has for too long been in the pocket of the policy wonks and the spin doctors. People demanded change and got it. The “rebels” must ask themselves this – do they want to see Jeremy Corbyn as the next Prime Minister of this country, or Boris Johnson (or whoever the Tory leader is in 2020). If any of them pick the latter then they should resign from the Labour Party immediately because they have gained office under false pretences.

David Cameron’s Empty Rhetoric

Earlier this week David Cameron claimed that Britain needed a pay rise and he asked the business community if they could facilitate such a move. If only he was in some kind of, oh I don’t know, position of power where he could legislate for this kind of change.

The best way to ensure decent pay, terms and conditions for workers is to have representation by robust trade unions, so the continual, ideological attacks upon those institutions demonstrates David Cameron’s real attitude towards working people.

This government has made it easier to fire people while making it more and more difficult to maintain a decent work/life balance. There has been an exceptional rise in the use of zero hours contracts – the type of contract which deems the worker to have less rights than those of workers with set hours. Workers have to wait two years before getting protection from unfair dismissal and fees of up to £1,200 are in place to get to a tribunal for unfair dismissal; because the one thing sacked workers have is cash on the hip yes? This has led to a decrease of 79% in overall claims – great news for Britain’s worst, racist, misogynist, disablist and homophobic bosses who can now sack a member of staff according to their own prejudices without any worries about the implications.

In addition plans are afoot the make striking harder to achieve. Trade unions already have to take over 250 separate steps before strike action can be legal and the UK is renowned across Europe as having the most restrictive trade union legislation already, without the suggested changes relating to turn outs and notice periods etc. This is nothing more than an attempt to further reduce the democratic method of opposing bad working practices and denigrate the bargaining abilities of workers and their representatives.

At the same time as this, executive bodies like the Gangmaster’s Licensing Authority and the Health and Safety Executive have had their budgets and staff cut to the extent where they are no longer able to carry out their jobs properly. This has led to an increase in workplace near misses and accidents and a series of incidents where people are earning less than the minimum wage; usually young or migrant workers.

After his little speech David Cameron hosted the Tories annual Black and White fundraising event to a crowd of party donors worth an estimated £22bn – we don’t know if he told these people to give their staff pay rises because the event was behind closed doors, no one really knows what happened in there – ah, open government and funding transparency! They expected to raise £3m from the event ahead of the election, which they clearly think I something for sale rather than a democratic process.

UK firms are currently hording £284bn in cash reserves and while we gave the bankers billions and billions of pounds of public money, bank lending is still down year on year for everything other than house buying – another bubble waiting to burst, and when it does the ordinary workers will once again be expected to pick up the tab for the failure of capital.

Meanwhile the staggering hypocrisy of his statement is overwhelming. As he has presided over a system that has implemented pay cuts and pay freezes all across the public sector, and in all areas of welfare spending he has the audacity to tell other company directors how to disperse their profits. One can’t help wondering that his words may have a semblance of authority if he practiced what he preached.

The cynical among us realise that this wasn’t a call for increased wages at all. We are now in an official election countdown and every word he utters is with a view to getting re-elected. He has no intention of giving workers a pay rise, whether they are directly under his control in the public sector or indirectly through encouragement and legislation. This was nothing more than a statement which he knew would be picked up in the media and played out as “Cameron calls for worker’s pay rise” hoping that the people are too stupid to realise it’s all a charade. I think the people are brighter than he gives them credit for. They will see through this ruse and hopefully boot him and his bought and paid for cronies out of the government benches on May 7th this year. The Tories will never deliver pay rises for working people.

Empire: Kenyan Reparations and Apologising for History

There is a theory going round which is spread by commentators in the Daily Mail such as Melanie Phillips and education secretary Michael Gove that all children have been taught about the British Empire in the last 30 years has been that it was dreadful, abhorrent and cruel and that this needs redressing. Speaking as someone who spent their entire educational existence within the last 30 years I can say this is quite categorically untrue.

The impression I left school with after doing my GCSE’s was that the British went oversees out of a sense of benevolence to educate native peoples and build infrastructure out of nothing but sheer altruism. We rocked up in our friendly sailboats, taught the locals how to trade, gave them a railway, the English language, had a game of cricket and left of our own volition in the 1950s. Imagine my horror when, after doing some of my own research as an adult, I find that this rose-washed view was not entirely accurate.

The recent case of three Kenyans seeking reparations for their treatment at the hands of the British in Kenya in the 1950s is instructive of the point here; three people have won the right to sue the present British government for what happened to them decades ago (torture, maiming, castration in one case etc). Apologists for empire will try and make the case that these events were an aberration or the work of a few bad apples, the same way that each British or American soldier involved in atrocities in Iraq or Afghanistan is “one bad egg” etc – there are only so many times you can stomach this before you realise the Hen is laying bad eggs.

Arguments about bad apples are similar in one key way to the next argument about the present government or regime or administration not being held responsible for the sins of the past – both arguments require no action on the part of those commiting the crime. The trick we used to get soldiers to commit these acts will sound familiar, we called the freedom fighters battling against oppression and occupation “terrorists” who were a “threat” to our way of life, we subhumanised them and as a result treated them as sub-human. Nothing speaks louder to the squaddie than “we are the goodies, they are the baddies”, black and white – and its even easier when skin colours are such. We still use the same methods to convince people that murder in the interest of the state is the right thing to do. That is the first point about why this is relevant.

The second comes from answering why should David Cameron’s government be called to account for what Harold MacMillan’s government perpetrated? Sometimes perhaps it is correct for people to have the right to forget, the victims that is, but they decide that themselves. However these people have decided they want some restorative justice and the people closest to those who were to blame are the present government, to whom else can they turn for at the very least, acknowledgement of what was done to them and by whom? To get a measure of these specific crimes one need only be told the story of arch-imperliast Churchill being told the more grim details of the affair and immediately breaking down in tears. Far more important though, at least more generally, in the case of injustices during Empire is that this is still a live debate.

There are many politicians, social commentators as mentioned and bona-fide historians who would have the world believe the British Empire benevolence myth. They accept none of the seething mass of atrocities which were carried out in our names and cling to an every decreasing list of justifications for their inherent belief that the British are somehow “better” than native peoples and we were required to tame them and use their resources for our own benefit as they wouldn’t know what to do with all those raw materials anyway. The only negative of empire that people such as Niall Ferguson accept is that it ended, and the world would be a better place had it not done so.

For every reparations case that comes forward and every apology that can be squeezed out of the government it shines a welcome and important spotlight on the darker parts of empire. It keeps the knowledge that these weren’t the crimes of Wellington or Palmerston but were events carried out well within living memory. Specifically in this Kenyan case, the use of concentration camps when you would have thought that Nazi Germany would have done enough to consign them to the dustbin of history. That people are still trying to debate this without accepting the negative connotations to our empire is what makes cases such as this, and any apologies forthcoming more than relevant, they are required and many more of them before a great number of us can ever look at our flag with any sense of pride ever again.

David Cameron and Political Lying

David Cameron’s speech to his party conference was littered with lies and untruths throughout. It was not the “left wing establishment” that tried to block the imposition of free schools in places like Hammersmith, it was in fact local schoolchildren’s parents who decided they didn’t want free schools imposed upon them. Similarly his rhetoric about borrowing and Labour being the party of borrowing was a lie since this government is set to borrow 22% more than they originally forecast this year. They are borrowing more now to pay for benefits for those workers they have sacked, instead of using that money to create jobs and bring forward infrastructural projects. His comments on lazy people claiming housing benefit were wrong since 93% of new claimants are in work, and the money they receive goes to pay for extortionate prices charged by landlords at rates which remain uncapped, unlike benefits.

The biggest lie of all is that borrowing money in the first place caused this financial crisis and now double dip recession. Labour borrowed steadily within limits before the collapse of Lehmann Brothers and borrowed money to bail the banks out after their illegal profligacy became apparent. The Tories and their chums in the media have managed to twist this in to the poor being culpable. Benefits were too high, wages too high, pensions too generous, the sick and disabled are just workshy, immigrants are stealing jobs. All of these are lies

The main point about lying is that it isn’t against the law, and nor should it be. So all David Cameron has to do, rather than tell the truth is to make the lies sound believable. This is why political speeches are so stage managed these days, and make up has to be just right as the words are gone through with a fine tooth comb and some boot polish. Not to wheedle out inaccuracies or falsehoods, in fact to insert them, but in the right places and be delivered with the correct level of humility and grace.

The art of political lying is the foremost asset an aspiring politician can manufacture for his or herself. This is why the majority of our politicians now come across, at least to those with a modicum of intelligence, as snake oil salesmen and women. Could someone as hopelessly flawed and incompetent as Jeremy Hunt or Michael Gove be employed in any other profession? Banking maybe would be the only other option, or PR as so many of these people have done.

Political lying is nothing new, writers from Cicero to Arbuthnot and Jonathan Swift along with our own contemporary Peter Oborne have wrote of its devilment, but it does no good. These people are never held to account for their lies, even in the House of Commons where such behaviour is in fact illegal. Lies are told daily in the House by all sides with Prime Ministers Questions being the worst culprit without any retribution handed down. This is where we are truly “all in it together”, or rather not us but the elite class of politicians. If they were suddenly held to account for their words in a public forum, and if any were genuinely called out on their wilful inaccuracies and terminological inexactitudes the veil would lift and we would see them all for the brazen husks of human beings they really are.

So David Cameron will continue to lie and people will continue to be taken in by his bare, narrative truths of artistic licence and burnish before doing the same thing in their own work and lives as an homage to spirit of Walter Mitty, after all, if you yourself believe your own lives then surely they become the truth?

The NHS and…. Tory Scum Hashtag Copyright

Today is the first day that the NHS can begin making up to half its income from private patients and it’s the next step up this dreary staircase towards full privatisation. Not modernising, not streamlining or rationalising – privatising. At the moment, what this does is create a two-tier system which means the rich can move ahead with their own surgery, in NHS time, from NHS doctors for a no doubt inflamed liver after too much Chateau Briand and Fois Gras while the rest of us have to line up politely behind for our urgent cancer treatment. There has already been a case of a private hospital that take NHS cases delaying operations for non-fee paying customers to try and get them to consider spending the money to queue jump.

The NHS has saved the lives of friends and relatives of mine, the people who work in it are superb and reports of its lack of sustainability are nothing more than lies and PR spin. There is one reason, and one reason only why the government are seeking to privatise this beloved institution and its money. The dying age of capitalism is a wounded beast and like all wounded beasts it is at its most dangerous now. There is nothing the rich will not do, no stone they will leave unturned in their quest for more money and power. They are psychopathic in this singular pursuit of wealth.

There is already one NHS hospital that has been sold and a second, the ironically titled George Eliot Hospital is next, and the only companies in the running for the contract just happen to have donated £2.4million to the Conservative Party. Of course this figure is nothing when compared with the amount of lobbying done to get the policy through in the first place. In the last decade or so the private health industry has donated over £14million to Tory coffers with chief fundraiser and donor Lord Ashcroft being prominent for his Medacs firm. Given that the NHS annual budget of around £106 billion, the privatisation of it has come at an awfully low price wouldn’t you agree? Profit making corporations now control £5 billion worth of our NHS. This will grow to £7 billion this year and every single contract of value above £20m has been won by a Tory donor. Trebles all round! Especially among the nine MPs who have collectively signed off £4 billion of NHS contracts in the past 8 months to companies they have personally received brib… sorry, donations or wages from.

Tory friends in the media have made sure people aren’t aware of what has been going on with an 8000 word report being released detailing how the NHS has been betrayed by another beloved public institution, the BBC.

Another tactic has been to make people believe this is necessary be deliberately sabotaging the NHS from within. Recent figures show that:

  • 25 A & E Wards are in the process of closing
  • 300 Ambulance Stations are being sold
  • 42,000 NHS staff have been sacked as of Spetember 2012 and yes that figure includes front line staff

Is it any wonder that 2012 saw the biggest drop in patient satisfaction in 30 years? The service is being destroyed in a premeditated fashion. And what of the people who have come in thanks to the new Act which has brought the private sector in to the fold?

  • In 2012, every major private healthcare provider, that’s: Virgin, Serco, Care UK, Circle, Spire, BMI, BUPA and Barchester have failed Care Quality Commission Inspections – but that’s OK because the Tories have decided the Care Quality Commission is a troublesome priest and are getting rid of it now.
  • From September 2012, North-Yorkshire has been placed in control of private consultancy firms who are advocating a) Less health visitors, b) Reduced treatments for minor injuries, mental health c) An end to follow up checks d) A reduction in the number of beds.
  • Agency spend is up 50% in 2012 which spreads the wealth to other areas of private interest, usually owned by the same people
  • Spending on negligence payouts have risen £500m in 2012 under the Tories.

The Tories have wanted rid of the NHS since its inception. It goes against everything they stand for – the every man for himself attitude and if you’re too poor to afford treatment then it’s your own fault. Social Darwinism and the Malthusian moment captured in the blink of one policy. The Freddy Krueger films of the 1980s had the tagline, don’t fall asleep. This is the Nightmare on Health Street, and whatever you do, don’t get sick.

(thanks to Eoin Clarke for many of the figures)